Another video by Christian John with this one a fundamental overview and hypothesis to the proposal of a new chemical element called Zeronium. As with Satoshi and him being credited with Bitcoin due to his fundamental overview and white paper this can be considered the same. As with Satoshi I am happy to take the credit for the discovery of the chemical element Zeronium and let others enjoy the calculations and effort. I have already worked on my Nobel prize speech and it will be pride of place on the mantlepiece. Christian John and its foundation will potentially provide sponsorship and support to any top university, physics or mathematical genius who wants to roll with this along side Christian John.

 

This is a fundamental overview and a good time to throw in a few other possible hypothesis that dare I say it contradict both Einstein and Hawkins, so the next few minutes are worth the read. 

 

Firstly, I believe that we can state with a high degree of certainty what the universe is expanding into. It has to be exactly the same composition and matrix as the universe itself as in a total vacuum of freezing temperatures just as the universe itself. If the composition and make up of the universe was in any way different to what it was expanding into we would see data to represent that. Data that would demonstrate some miscibility before the two combine in a homogenous manner, reflection or refraction in some way shape or form with the two requiring to mix as they collide. The fact we see not a thread of evidence to this has to demonstrate with a high degree of certainty that the is no mixing required, no homogenous balance require but simply two identical matrix composition’s meeting. The universe is therefore with a very high probability expanding into the exact same vacuum and freezing temperature as itself contains.

 

Secondly, and this is where I would like to contradict Hawkins and Einstein in their theory of gravity and what it is. Gravity is one of the very rare areas and calculations where we know we can calculate it, determine orbits and flight paths in space therefore our calculations are correct but we still do not know what gravity is and how it actually works. The fact that we can calculate it does not for a second determine that we understand what it is. I believe that they were both wrong in that and I will try and explain.

 

They believed that there is a space matrix that exists that dependent upon different masses will impact on that matrix. A good way to think about this is with a stretched out net. If you put two balls either side on a stretched out net, one heavier than the other, then the lighter ball will move towards the heavier ball because the heavier ball will be lower down in the net. That is the way they saw gravity. I say hypothetically no there is nothing in space, no matrix, no dark matter, nothing whatsoever apart from a vacuum and freezing temperatures. My hypothesis is that it is some centrifugal particle force that pulls matter together and the bigger the matter the bigger the centrifugal force, and the fact that it is in space with zero force acting against this as in a total vacuum then this force can seem weak but have an impact as it does.

 

Another contradiction I believe from the two geniuses stated is around the formation and what a black hole actually is and this is where my chemical element Zeronium comes into play.  A black hole does not form from a collapsed star as stated definitely by Hawkins but also possibly Einstein it is actually the opposite. The star collapses inwards due to the formation of a black hole itself at its centre which is why it forms that dilapidated shape as is it is being sucked from the inside. It is due to the black hole and not the other way around. This takes an immense amount of energy as in billions of years at millions of degree’s coupled with the pressure at the centre of the star and finally you get the creation of Zeronium.

 

A black hole, and what would also be the Big Bang itself, is the creation of the chemical element Zeronium. It has no molecular weight at all. No atoms which is why it’s attraction is so powerful as it is desperately trying to fill its empty orbitals but with so much energy and force that the moment that any atoms be that protons, neutrons or electrons come close they themselves are destroyed and Zeronium itself keeps maintaining its Zero atomic status. This also makes sense at the Big Bang because we know after the bang hydrogen and helium were formed one after another which have molecular weights of one and two respectively. Therefore it makes sense that the element prior to that, as in the Big Bang itself, has a molecular weight of zero.

 

Also Einstein and Hawkins stated that black holes had such a gravitational pull that they could pull light itself into the hole. This I also believe is wrong in its statement due to the following hypothesis related to the above. Firstly, you cannot have light traveling for billions of years through the universe coming into contact with mass and gravity without it having some impact if gravity was able to have any impact. Be that 1%, 0.01%, 0.000001% but we would see at least the slightest deviation in light over such a huge range if gravity could have any impact whatsoever. We do not see any impact or variation. Therefore to state that a black hole is gravitation no matter how powerful has to be wrong because it can pull light towards it. Therefore, it cannot be gravity it has to be another mechanism and dynamic in the quantum world that we simply do not understand but for sure it is not gravity. It has to be on another level such as the Zeronium state that has the strongest force in the attraction of all electrons, protons and neutrons towards it resulting in all matter and light.

 

The talk of dark matter in the universe consisting of 80% of all energy is also wrong I hypothesise and as stated in the beginning that there is nothing but only a vacuum in space. The creation of the dark matter hypothesis is simply to put a constant into the equations that themselves are wrong to try and balance them out and probably demonstrates how far we are away from really understanding what we need to understand on the quantum level and what is gravity to black holes and the potential for the chemical element Zeronium.

 

I will also do another talk on chaos and on why there is no such thing as chaos, why there is only order, and that the universe is not becoming more chaotic as is stated in entropy and many physical mathematical lectures and hypothesis but that our world and the universe only ever consists of order. 

 

Yes, full of ego? A big head? I dare to state Einstein and Hawkins were wrong? 

 

Please call me whatever you like and want to makes yourselves feel better, I care not. I would always rather be wrong but to dare and challenge than to fall into the crowd on any subject or topic. That does not make me a poor team player not prepared to hop, skip and jump to everyones beat it makes me a unique individual with a mind of his own. Welcome to Christian John.